Climbers are packing their duffels, continuing their training and practicing their goodbyes. They leave for Kathmandu in about a month. By now they have researched and selected their route. Some on the north, ed others on the south. There are over 18 named routes on Everest and a couple that are still unclimbed. The vast majority of climbers use two routes: South Col or the Northeast Ridge Standard aka North Col route.

I will be climbing the South Col route on International Mountain Guide’s Classic program. They provide total logistics support plus a personal climbing Sherpa who I will meet early in the expedition and climb with throughout my expedition. IMG’s services include oxygen, all the group gear, weather services, food and ongoing consultation and support through the climb. Since 1990, over 450 IMG team members have summited the world’s classic 8,000-meter peaks, including over 250 on Everest. I am very glad to be climbing with them this time around.

However there are the climbers who follow their own route. 2011 has several interesting ones to watch. First up is David Tait who will do a very independent climb on Lhotse fixing his own ropes and then attempt Everest without supplemental O’s late in the season. Once again we will get to follow 69-year-old Bill Burke climbing with David Liano. They will climb from Tibet first then move over to Nepal for a second summit – a first if they make it. Another story is with Paul Parkinson who also wants to climb without O’s but via the west ridge, solo and wearing the clothes of the Mallory & Irvine days.

Both the traditional north and south routes have their pros and cons. Up until 2007, the trend was for more climbers to choose the north due to lower costs. But with the Chinese restricting permits over the past few years, the south side has retained the lead as the preferred route primarily due to commercial operators wanting to reduce uncertainty and to limit their risks.

In 2010, there were 513 total summits on both sides of Everest plus eight more in the Fall. According to Asian Trekking’s Ang Tshering Sherpas regular news letter, there were 157 foreigners who summited along with 190 Sherpas on the south and an estimated 165 on the north side.

He further quotes the Grand Dame of all Everest statics, Ms. Elizabeth Hawley that 5070 people have now summited Everest since 1953 and about 3431 of those are single summits with the rest being multiple summits. There were 268 new summits in 2010.

With both sides once again attracting crowds for 2011, let’s compare them:

South Col Route

Pluses Concerns
Beautiful trek to base camp in the Khumbu Khumbu Icefall instability
Easy access to villages for pre-summit recovery Crowds, especially on summit night
Helicopter rescue from base camp if necessary Cornice Traverse exposure
Slightly warmer sometimes with less winds Slightly longer summit night



Northeast Ridge Route

Pluses Concerns
Less crowds Colder temps and harsher winds
Can drive to base camp Camps at higher elevations
Easier climbing to mid-level camps A bit more difficult with smooth or loose rocks
Slightly shorter summit night No opportunity for helicopter rescue at any point

Now let’s take an in-depth look at both sides

South Col Route

Mt. Everest was first summited by Sherpa Tenzing Norgay and New

Zealander Edmond Hillary with a British expedition in 1953. They used the South Col route. At that time the route had only been attempted twice by Swiss teams in the spring and autumn of 1952. They reached 8500m well above the South Col. Of note, Norgay was with the Swiss thus giving him the experience he used on the British expedition. The Swiss returned in 1956 to make the second summit of Everest.

Here is a typical south side climb schedule showing average time and the distance from the previous camp plus a brief description of each section. More details can be found on the South Col route page.

For a more detailed description and animated route map, please see the  South Col route page.

Northeast Ridge Route

The north side of Everest is steeped in history with multiple attempts throughout the 1920’s and 1930’s. The first attempt was by a British team in 1921. Mallory led a small team to be the first human to set foot on the mountains flanks by climbing up to the North Col (7003m). The second expedition, in 1922 reached 27,300? before turning back, and was the first team to use supplemental oxygen. It was also on this expedition that the first deaths were reported when an avalanche killed seven Sherpas.

The 1924 British expedition with George Mallory and Andrew “Sandy” Irvine is most notable for the mystery of whether they summited or not. If they did summit, that would precede Tenzing and Hilary by 29 years. Mallory’s body was found in 1999 but there was no proof that he died going up or coming down.

A Chinese team made the first summit from Tibet on May 25, 1960. Nawang Gombu (Tibetan) and Chinese Chu Yin-Hau and Wang Fu-zhou, who is said to have climbed the Second Step in his sock feet, claimed the honor.  In 1975, on a successful summit expedition, the Chinese installed the ladder on the Second Step.

Tibet was closed to foreigners from 1950 to 1980 preventing any further attempts until a Japanese team summited in 1980 via the Hornbein Couloir on the North Face.

The north side started to attract more climbers in the mid 1990s and today is almost as popular as the South side when the Chinese allow permits. In 2008 and 2009, obtaining a permit was difficult thus preventing many expeditions from attempting any route from Tibet.

Now let’s look at typical north side schedule showing average time from the previous camp plus a brief description of each section. More details can be found on the Northeast Ridge route page.

For a more detailed description and route pictures, please see the Northeast Ridge route page.

The Deadly Side

To start any discussion on climbing deaths, it must be said that every death is devastating to family and friends and should never be taken lightly. I have helped bury climbing partners on high peaks and never wish that experience on anyone.

Sadly, mountaineering often receives mainstream media attention only when someone dies and especially on Everest. This was never more true than during the 1996 season that saw 8 people killed in a storm and then in 2006 when another 12 died while climbing.

According to Eberhard Jurgalski’s research website, since 1922 the fatality rate was 5.4% but has dropped to around 4.4% since 1990 due to better gear, weather forecasting and more rescue resources available; ironically, due to more climbers on the mountain. As previously mentioned there were about 513 summits in 2010 with 4 deaths, all on the north.

I wanted to examine the true statistics behind Everest in the past decade and looked to research for some facts. Based on his tables, the north side fatality rate is more than 2:1 over the south with falls, altitude issues and exhaustion noted as the primary reasons. The difference is even more extreme when the deaths of 9 south side Sherpas are taken from the total, making the ratio of “member or member” climber deaths from north to south 8:1. Here is the summary update with 2010 statistics:

Reason

North Ridge Route

South Col Route

Other Routes

Fall 7 3 1
Altitude 9 2 1
Exhaustion 8 1 1
Unknown 6 1 1
Avalanche 1 3 2
Crevasse 0 4 0
Exposure 4 0 0
Heart 1 1 0
36 15 6

That the north side death rate is higher is not a big surprise. The north is traditionally considered slightly more dangerous given the exposure to the cold and harsh winds plus the technical nature of the Steps and exposed rock on the summit ridge.

Due to lower costs, more independent climbers are on the north thus sometimes finding themselves alone in the event of a problem. Also, it seems that more climbers do not use supplemental oxygen on the north than on the south which also can accelerate altitude issues especially in the harshest of conditions.

However, there is no strong correlation between deaths of independent climbers vs climbers on commercial expeditions. Finally, with the exception of 2005 through 2007, the south has had significantly more climbers thus more rescue resources in the event of a problem. Traditionally, commercial operators have focused on the south thus fielding more Sherpas.

As far as nationalities, the Nepalese Sherpas suffer the most with 10 of the 57 deaths this decade almost all on the south side from falls, avalanches and crevasse accidents. 6 South Koren climbers have died but no other single nationality has more than 4 deaths in the past decade. As far as operators, no one operator stood out since the majority of the non-Sherpa deaths were of climbers on private national climbs,  large shared permits or were climbing independently.

Summary

I am often asked which side is safer and my answer is pick your poison. The south has the Khumbu Icefall and the north has the Steps and weather. However these numbers clearly show the north takes a stronger toll. But the real story is the role and impact of the unsung heroes – the Sherpas.

In spite of the Icefall dangers, I think most operators will say the south side is safer and slightly easier. The sobering statistic backs up this advice – more climbers, by a 2:1 ratio,  have died on the north than the south since 2000.

But the real answer is no one knows for certain what each season will bring. So train hard, get skills on low mountains and altitude experience on another 8000m mountain before Everest and go with a team you can count on in an emergency.

Climb On!

Alan

12 Responses

  1. Nice statistics…but limited only on these ‘touristic’ or ‘yellow brick road’ routes. What about other, real mountaineering routes (Kangshung side, West ridge…)?

  2. Hi Alan. Hadn’t checked in for a while but now that I know you’re making another attempt this year I’m excited to follow. Good luck with your climb. Looking forward to it. Take care. Dewey

  3. Please note as per Himalayan Database- Elizabeth Howleys statistics posted in Adventurestats.com the total summits of Everest in 2010 Spring season from both sides is 527. 171 from North side & 356 from south side. The list gives the detailed names of each individual with their nationality, date & time of ascent.

  4. Ha, also I just found out that my photo of the Hillary Step is that of Alison Irvine. I just emailed her speakers bureau with the pic. I hope she geta buzz out it.

  5. It was interesting to note that David Tait in Season 3 of the Discovery series stated that he found the South side ascent harder than that form the North. Perhaps due to the longer time and greater elevation gain?

  6. I just watched your Youtube video where you packed for Aconcagua. It may be my favorite solely because your cat walks through it nonchalantly as if to say “Somethings going on, he’s packing all that crap again”. So cute! And the video was very informative too!

  7. Again Alan, great coverage! I would like to echo Paul and Fiona’s times. My times in 2010 were all within those ranges. So, may I provide another confirmation of all of your anticipated times from BC to the Summit and back. Like Paul said it all depends on the queues. I’m rooting for you Alan! Best wishes.

  8. Hi Alan, Good luck with the climb. I am very interested to know what your plan is for this year (assuming you are happy to share it) and in particular if there is anything different that you are planning to do on the mountain compared with your previous attempts. This information might be useful for other climbers in the future.
    Regards,
    Paul Adler.
    BTW, I am not 100% sure about the time you have for the section from the Balcony to the South Summit. It’s still 300m of height to gain and about the same difficulty as the section up to the Balcony (or maybe even a little harder near the SS), so it would be more like 3-5 hours time. South Summit to Summit is 1-2 hours if there are no queues. I took 4hrs from SC to the Balcony, 4 hours Bal to SS and 1 hr SS to the Summit. Descent was 2hrs back to SC. Fiona was similar in 06.

    1. Thanks Paul, always good to get your input. I updated the times to reflect yours and Fiona’s experience